Search This Blog


Tuesday, 30 August 2016

Barham Trust Returns Yet Again

Martin Francis tells us that Paul Lorber is trying to whip people up to attend the next Barham Trust meeting.  Back in October 2015, the Trust decided to rent out a small part of the building complex to Paul Lorber's organisation.  Despite the length of time which has passed, it seems that a lease has still not been signed.  Paul Lorber told a meeting I attended in Willesden Library that nonetheless he had been in occupation of the site since March, and although he had permission only to use it for storage his activities had been more extensive than that.

Back in October, I suggested that his real intention was simply to use the site to stir up trouble.  This was based on my knowledge of him over many years, including his previous acrobatics relating to Barham Park leases.  Indeed, he also engaged in all sorts of games during the Libraries Transformation Project process

In fact, if the Committee (which has not published its agenda at the time of writing) is going to award a lease I suspect most of the meeting and the documents will be with held _ as they are likely to contain financial information.

It all seems a rather odd way of doing things.

Monday, 29 August 2016

Sunday, 28 August 2016

Walm Lane Ward?

Passing down Walm Lane, I saw that the Safer Neighbourhood base there is now earmarked as being for "Walm Lane Ward".  Presumably this is the Met. trying to cope with lower resources. 

Saturday, 27 August 2016

Brent Council Carbon Footprint

Brent Council is happily advertising a fall in its carbon footprint of 11.3%, but it would be nice to have a better idea of what this means.  The figures appear to come from this report, although I am not sure why they are press released now.  The report itself is plain that different measures are in use, and the whole area can get quite confusing.

What about Schools?
The figures Brent are highlighting exclude schools, aside from "bulge" schools using Council buildings.  Were schools to be included, it would probably double the building amount of emissions.  Moreover, given the growing number of school places being provided, that element of the emissions might be going up.  Offseting the sheer rise in numbers and the quantity of buildings, there has been a long standing programme to make schools more energy efficient, partly through insisting on high environmental standards at new buildings, and partly through retrofitting technology on existing buildings. 

Brent Civic Centre
The building element is the main reducing element, seeing a fall of more than 25% from 2013/14 to 2015/16.  That is from 7,246 to 5,770 tonnes CO2e.  The main contributor to this will be Brent Civic Centre.  As a BREEAM outstanding building, the Civic Centre has an excellent performance in both carbon emissions and in other ways.

The building started to receive staff part way into 2013, which is being used as the baseline for these numbers, but it will have taken time to get a full year effect.  Partly, this is the result of staff only moving in from June 2013; partly it will be because the full benefits only became apparent as staff got used to the new ways of working.  Finally, it took time for Council staff to move out from some of the older buildings such as Brent House, so the carbon emissions will only have ceased once those disposed of.

Other Council Buildings
Brent Council will also have benefited from investment elsewhere.  The new Willesden Library had a much improved carbon performance compared to the old one.  Brent Council has also done some retorfitting of older buildings such as Kilburn Library, although I have explained elsewhere that this is not as good as having somewhere new. 

Street Lighting
The diminishing proportion of carbon emissions coming from buildings means that further big fall will have to come from street lighting, as I have argued before

Sunday, 14 August 2016

Improving Harlesden Town Centre

Noting my post a couple of days ago, some one suggested to me that the block of flats on the corner of Rucklidge Avenue and Park Parade ( the old Willesden Social Club site) is not especially beautiful.  I agree it is not, although it is a lot better than when it was derelict land, and still doesn't look too bad to me.  Here is the front:

Here is a view from the back:

It tapers down toward the properties on Rucklidge avenue for privacy reasons.  The more important thing about the development is that it improves that part of Harlesden Town Centre.  Removing the derelict land designs out an area of anti-social behavior.  The planning enforcement at the Green Man helps with some of the activity associated with that building, and the natural overlooking of Design Works by the people in the new flats will help limit complaints of misbehaviour there.  All of this contributes, albeit incrementally, to the improvement of the Town Centre.

As the planning powers of local authorities are limited, and the resources available for strategic planning slide downward, taking advantage of small incremental improvements becomes ever more important. 

Friday, 12 August 2016

Flats Completing

Passing by recently, I noticed that the flats on the old Willesden Social Club site are virtually complete.  I first started to campaign for that site to be built on in late 2005.  I little thought it would take a decade to get there.