I notice that there is a call to halt all new regeneration going ahead. This is problematic for several reasons.
Firstly, halting work on such projects creates a cash problem for whoever is funding the work. Typically, private developers need the work to be completed as soon as possible since they don't get any funding until they can start selling the properties. Halting regeneration is therefore a call for landbanking by another name.
Secondly a key part of dealing with the climate emergency that I suspect Brent Council is about to declare requires changes to housing stock since out of date housing stock is responsible for much of the UK's climate change emissions. There is flat contradiction in declaring this an urgent problem and then refusing to try to reduce the emissions. Admittedly new housing is only part of that solution, with retrofitting of huge importance as well, but anyone who just wants to block regeneration clearly doesn't believe reducing carbon emissions is urgent business.
Thirdly, the problem that seems to be complained about above is mould growing on some of the buildings. That might quite easily be down to poor management of them rather than anything to do with construction, so the process of halting new build is unlikely to address the problem that has been identified.
Fourthly, anyone who knows Brent knows that we have (a) a massive, and I mean massive, shortage of housing supply in raw units or in types of housing (b) a crisis of affordability with many people totally unable to find remotely affordable housing.
Is this just another case of ill considered protest politics?
No comments:
Post a Comment