Yesterday, I promised to cover pub protection policies in Brent, which are affected by proposed changes to planning policy. These have been subject to controversy as a result of Cllr Muhammed Butt's rather odd handling of the issue in relation to the Save Our Queensbury group.
This group were interested in blocking the redevelopment of the The Queensbury site close to Willesden Green station, which I also opposed. As part of this effort they argued for changes to planning policy, and said that Cllr Butt supported them. However, he does not appear to have done so in a public forum and they seem to have felt quite frustrated at his lack of communication.
The matter has now been covered in the changes to Brent's planning policies, although this reads more as a result of CAMRA's intervention. The policy now includes an assessment of economic viability, as well as the "vitality" of the area. It also seeks to protect the external fabric, which I imagine means something like the former Spotted Dog in Willesden High Road. It also enables the Committee to block change of use if a "credible" offer has been received for its continued use as a pub where it is listed as an asset of Community Value.
All this gives some additional protection to pubs, but nowhere should go away with the expectation that pubs cannot be converted under these rules.
Thursday, 1 September 2016
Wednesday, 31 August 2016
Brent Council Planning Policy Changes
Brent Council is now modifying its development planning policies. The length of time this takes is disappointing, but the actual changes are quite welcome.
The spread of betting shops will be made more difficult. Takeaways and shisha cafes will not be allowed near secondary schools which is something I have argued for for a long time. There are also welcome change to provisions for drainage to prevent surface flooding and some tightening on carbon emissions. It is also good to see that the Council is doing its best to protect its affordabl;e housing targets in the present very unfavourable climate.
There is also some material on pub protection, which I will cover in a separate post.
The spread of betting shops will be made more difficult. Takeaways and shisha cafes will not be allowed near secondary schools which is something I have argued for for a long time. There are also welcome change to provisions for drainage to prevent surface flooding and some tightening on carbon emissions. It is also good to see that the Council is doing its best to protect its affordabl;e housing targets in the present very unfavourable climate.
There is also some material on pub protection, which I will cover in a separate post.
Tuesday, 30 August 2016
Barham Trust Returns Yet Again
Martin Francis tells us that Paul Lorber is trying to whip people up to attend the next Barham Trust meeting. Back in October 2015, the Trust decided to rent out a small part of the building complex to Paul Lorber's organisation. Despite the length of time which has passed, it seems that a lease has still not been signed. Paul Lorber told a meeting I attended in Willesden Library that nonetheless he had been in occupation of the site since March, and although he had permission only to use it for storage his activities had been more extensive than that.
Back in October, I suggested that his real intention was simply to use the site to stir up trouble. This was based on my knowledge of him over many years, including his previous acrobatics relating to Barham Park leases. Indeed, he also engaged in all sorts of games during the Libraries Transformation Project process.
In fact, if the Committee (which has not published its agenda at the time of writing) is going to award a lease I suspect most of the meeting and the documents will be with held _ as they are likely to contain financial information.
It all seems a rather odd way of doing things.
Back in October, I suggested that his real intention was simply to use the site to stir up trouble. This was based on my knowledge of him over many years, including his previous acrobatics relating to Barham Park leases. Indeed, he also engaged in all sorts of games during the Libraries Transformation Project process.
In fact, if the Committee (which has not published its agenda at the time of writing) is going to award a lease I suspect most of the meeting and the documents will be with held _ as they are likely to contain financial information.
It all seems a rather odd way of doing things.
Monday, 29 August 2016
BREEAM on Brent Civic Centre
Following my positive comments on the environmental performance of Brent Civic Centre the other day, it is worth looking at what BREEAM itself says about the project. This really is an example of Brent Council being at the cutting edge of progress.
Sunday, 28 August 2016
Walm Lane Ward?
Passing down Walm Lane, I saw that the Safer Neighbourhood base there is now earmarked as being for "Walm Lane Ward". Presumably this is the Met. trying to cope with lower resources.
Saturday, 27 August 2016
Brent Council Carbon Footprint
Brent Council is happily advertising a fall in its carbon footprint of 11.3%, but it would be nice to have a better idea of what this means. The figures appear to come from this report, although I am not sure why they are press released now. The report itself is plain that different measures are in use, and the whole area can get quite confusing.
What about Schools?
The figures Brent are highlighting exclude schools, aside from "bulge" schools using Council buildings. Were schools to be included, it would probably double the building amount of emissions. Moreover, given the growing number of school places being provided, that element of the emissions might be going up. Offseting the sheer rise in numbers and the quantity of buildings, there has been a long standing programme to make schools more energy efficient, partly through insisting on high environmental standards at new buildings, and partly through retrofitting technology on existing buildings.
Brent Civic Centre
The building element is the main reducing element, seeing a fall of more than 25% from 2013/14 to 2015/16. That is from 7,246 to 5,770 tonnes CO2e. The main contributor to this will be Brent Civic Centre. As a BREEAM outstanding building, the Civic Centre has an excellent performance in both carbon emissions and in other ways.
The building started to receive staff part way into 2013, which is being used as the baseline for these numbers, but it will have taken time to get a full year effect. Partly, this is the result of staff only moving in from June 2013; partly it will be because the full benefits only became apparent as staff got used to the new ways of working. Finally, it took time for Council staff to move out from some of the older buildings such as Brent House, so the carbon emissions will only have ceased once those disposed of.
Other Council Buildings
Brent Council will also have benefited from investment elsewhere. The new Willesden Library had a much improved carbon performance compared to the old one. Brent Council has also done some retorfitting of older buildings such as Kilburn Library, although I have explained elsewhere that this is not as good as having somewhere new.
Street Lighting
The diminishing proportion of carbon emissions coming from buildings means that further big fall will have to come from street lighting, as I have argued before.
What about Schools?
The figures Brent are highlighting exclude schools, aside from "bulge" schools using Council buildings. Were schools to be included, it would probably double the building amount of emissions. Moreover, given the growing number of school places being provided, that element of the emissions might be going up. Offseting the sheer rise in numbers and the quantity of buildings, there has been a long standing programme to make schools more energy efficient, partly through insisting on high environmental standards at new buildings, and partly through retrofitting technology on existing buildings.
Brent Civic Centre
The building element is the main reducing element, seeing a fall of more than 25% from 2013/14 to 2015/16. That is from 7,246 to 5,770 tonnes CO2e. The main contributor to this will be Brent Civic Centre. As a BREEAM outstanding building, the Civic Centre has an excellent performance in both carbon emissions and in other ways.
The building started to receive staff part way into 2013, which is being used as the baseline for these numbers, but it will have taken time to get a full year effect. Partly, this is the result of staff only moving in from June 2013; partly it will be because the full benefits only became apparent as staff got used to the new ways of working. Finally, it took time for Council staff to move out from some of the older buildings such as Brent House, so the carbon emissions will only have ceased once those disposed of.
Other Council Buildings
Brent Council will also have benefited from investment elsewhere. The new Willesden Library had a much improved carbon performance compared to the old one. Brent Council has also done some retorfitting of older buildings such as Kilburn Library, although I have explained elsewhere that this is not as good as having somewhere new.
Street Lighting
The diminishing proportion of carbon emissions coming from buildings means that further big fall will have to come from street lighting, as I have argued before.
Sunday, 14 August 2016
Improving Harlesden Town Centre
Noting my post a couple of days ago, some one suggested to me that the block of flats on the corner of Rucklidge Avenue and Park Parade ( the old Willesden Social Club site) is not especially beautiful. I agree it is not, although it is a lot better than when it was derelict land, and still doesn't look too bad to me. Here is the front:
Here is a view from the back:
It tapers down toward the properties on Rucklidge avenue for privacy reasons. The more important thing about the development is that it improves that part of Harlesden Town Centre. Removing the derelict land designs out an area of anti-social behavior. The planning enforcement at the Green Man helps with some of the activity associated with that building, and the natural overlooking of Design Works by the people in the new flats will help limit complaints of misbehaviour there. All of this contributes, albeit incrementally, to the improvement of the Town Centre.
As the planning powers of local authorities are limited, and the resources available for strategic planning slide downward, taking advantage of small incremental improvements becomes ever more important.
Here is a view from the back:
It tapers down toward the properties on Rucklidge avenue for privacy reasons. The more important thing about the development is that it improves that part of Harlesden Town Centre. Removing the derelict land designs out an area of anti-social behavior. The planning enforcement at the Green Man helps with some of the activity associated with that building, and the natural overlooking of Design Works by the people in the new flats will help limit complaints of misbehaviour there. All of this contributes, albeit incrementally, to the improvement of the Town Centre.
As the planning powers of local authorities are limited, and the resources available for strategic planning slide downward, taking advantage of small incremental improvements becomes ever more important.
Friday, 12 August 2016
Flats Completing
Passing by recently, I noticed that the flats on the old Willesden Social Club site are virtually complete. I first started to campaign for that site to be built on in late 2005. I little thought it would take a decade to get there.
Thursday, 11 August 2016
Libraries are Changing
Public Libraries News has an interesting link to the changing uses of technology in libraries. I get the impression there is very little understanding of how public libraries are changing rapidly. The rise of WiFi is one, important example of this. Too often, though, the discussion on public libraries is held as if they had all remained the same since the 1940s.
Tuesday, 2 August 2016
Owen Jones and Jeremy Corbyn
Even Owen Jones has stopped supporting Jeremy Corbyn in the Labour Leadership election. This adds to the vast majority of Labour MPs, former economic advisers, all the living former Leaders of the Labour Party and many others. If Jeremy is re-elected how can he continue without the support of all these people?
Monday, 1 August 2016
The Lord Loves a Sinner Come to his Understanding
Martin Francis quotes a local resident on Brent's bulky waste service. It turns out to be none other than former Liberal Democrat councillor Paul Lorber, who is dissatisified with the way the service now works.
This is ironic as Paul Lorber, when Leader of the Council, introduced charging for what had up to then been a free service. This was despite their promising prior to the 2006 elections that they would keep the service free. This was one of a large number of broken Liberal Democrat promises. After they introduced fees in 2007, the rate of collections fell through the floor. When Labour came to power in 2010, the free service was restored. Neither Martin or Paul found time to mention this history.
However, I welcome the interest in how the Public Realm Contract is put together. I always argued that the time to concentrate on specification was before the contract was awarded, when the bidders were under maximum pressure to give the Council the best possible deal. Unfortunately, Martin and others were too busy whipping up noise about Israel to pay attention to what the contract was actually about.
Still it is good that they have become interested now.
Monitoring
Martin appears to be objecting to the practice of self monitoring, although this is common in such contracts. The argument is that getting the contractor to sort out the problems as a first resort is the quickest way to sort things out, and I think that is true. Martin may not be aware that modern technology allows a much greater degree of tracking that previously. Provided that the Council is diligently practising open book accounting for the contract, it should have at least as much control as previously.
Enforcement
He, and his commentator, also seems to be a bit confused about the enforcement against litter. This has ben awarded to a separate company to Veolia, so it doesn't seem to be particularly sensible to bundle them together. I am not sure if the proposed, punitive, approach will work. I suspect at this point it is too early to say.
This is ironic as Paul Lorber, when Leader of the Council, introduced charging for what had up to then been a free service. This was despite their promising prior to the 2006 elections that they would keep the service free. This was one of a large number of broken Liberal Democrat promises. After they introduced fees in 2007, the rate of collections fell through the floor. When Labour came to power in 2010, the free service was restored. Neither Martin or Paul found time to mention this history.
However, I welcome the interest in how the Public Realm Contract is put together. I always argued that the time to concentrate on specification was before the contract was awarded, when the bidders were under maximum pressure to give the Council the best possible deal. Unfortunately, Martin and others were too busy whipping up noise about Israel to pay attention to what the contract was actually about.
Still it is good that they have become interested now.
Monitoring
Martin appears to be objecting to the practice of self monitoring, although this is common in such contracts. The argument is that getting the contractor to sort out the problems as a first resort is the quickest way to sort things out, and I think that is true. Martin may not be aware that modern technology allows a much greater degree of tracking that previously. Provided that the Council is diligently practising open book accounting for the contract, it should have at least as much control as previously.
Enforcement
He, and his commentator, also seems to be a bit confused about the enforcement against litter. This has ben awarded to a separate company to Veolia, so it doesn't seem to be particularly sensible to bundle them together. I am not sure if the proposed, punitive, approach will work. I suspect at this point it is too early to say.
Sunday, 31 July 2016
Why Butt in Now?
Brent Council leader Cllr Muhammed Butt has made a little remarked u-turn regarding BDS and Israel here. The most remarkable statement in it is:
"So when boycotters wanted Brent to cancel its contracts with vendors who do business in Israel, the decision to say no was one of the quickest and easiest I have had to make."
This is a reference to the awarding of Brent's Public Realm contract, a topis in which Cllr Butt actually showed very little interest. When the BDS campaign, very late in the day, started to object to the new contract being potentially awarded to Veolia, Cllr Butt actually dithered for an inordinate amount of time before following the legal advice that had been available from the start that ruling the company out of the competition was out of the question.
Similarly, there had also been an Israel centred controversy over the Tricycle Theatre's attitude to the Jewish Film Festival. Although Cllr Butt sits on the board of the theatre, he made no comments on the matter either way.
Why then is Cllr Butt writing his article now? I take it that whoever is instructing him has decided that he needs to rehabilitate himself following his resignation as London Councils' Equalities lead. This was linked to the rows over anti-semitism at the time. If Cllr Butt wants to fully restore his reputation in such matters, he should look at his record in the Rosemary Clarke case.
"So when boycotters wanted Brent to cancel its contracts with vendors who do business in Israel, the decision to say no was one of the quickest and easiest I have had to make."
This is a reference to the awarding of Brent's Public Realm contract, a topis in which Cllr Butt actually showed very little interest. When the BDS campaign, very late in the day, started to object to the new contract being potentially awarded to Veolia, Cllr Butt actually dithered for an inordinate amount of time before following the legal advice that had been available from the start that ruling the company out of the competition was out of the question.
Similarly, there had also been an Israel centred controversy over the Tricycle Theatre's attitude to the Jewish Film Festival. Although Cllr Butt sits on the board of the theatre, he made no comments on the matter either way.
Why then is Cllr Butt writing his article now? I take it that whoever is instructing him has decided that he needs to rehabilitate himself following his resignation as London Councils' Equalities lead. This was linked to the rows over anti-semitism at the time. If Cllr Butt wants to fully restore his reputation in such matters, he should look at his record in the Rosemary Clarke case.
Saturday, 30 July 2016
Willesden High Road Repaving
It is good to see that soime repaving of Willesden High Road has finally started. The poor state of the pavements on Willesden High Road has blighted the area for years.
Sunday, 24 July 2016
Martin Francis Barking Up the Wrong Lamp Posts
Martin Francis is complaining about Brent Council painting lamp posts, and seems to think it something new. In fact, this is routine, which anyone who looks at the number of painted street lights around the place might be expected to realise. The "new" change he highlights is that the default colour is black, or "raven black" as I believe the Council likes to call it. This was decided as part of passing the Placemaking Guide in February 2011.
Thursday, 21 July 2016
Ongoing Failure Under Jeremy Corbyn
As Jeremy Corbyn launches his re-election campaign today, I thought it might be worth pointing to what the ex-Shadow Cabinet critics say about him. These are people from the so-called "Make it Work" tendency, who tried to work with him and then gave up.
But first it is well worth watching "The Outsider" documentary by Vice TV. This is a film made by avowed Corbyn supporters invited in by Seamus Milne, but it ends up coming across as something of a hatchet job by simple reporting. I am particularly thinking of Jeremy's refusal to attack the government following Iain Duncan Smith's resignation, which was frankly a bizarre way for the Leader of the Opposition to behave.
The ex-Shadow Cabinet portray an Opposition Leader who appears not to even want to oppose the Tories. Lilian Greenwood felt she was constantly undermined. Thanggam Debbonaire has a still more damning picture of ineptitude. Heidi Alexander thinks he doesn't have capacity to lead. These members have gone public, but I suspect all his former spokespeople would have similar stories of indecision, poor consultation, missing basic deadlines and so on.
This is before one gets on to Jeremy Corbyn's refusal to make any effort to unite the party on difficult policies like Trident (it is worth recalling that a continuous at sea deterrent remains Labour's official policy); his lack of an economic policy, his apparent knee jerk anti-western prejudices on Syria and the Ukraine; his shameful acceptance of payment from Press TV; his past record on the IRA, his equivocation on anti-semitism, and so on.
None of this seems to matter to many of the people signing up to the Labour Party to vote in our elections, but it does to the electors at large. As I write, Labour's poll standing is 29% and heading downwards _ which would take it beneath Michael Foot's horrific defeat in 1983. If that happens there may not be much of a Labour Party left to lead.
Nonetheless, Jeremy remains the favourite to win the party leadership, but then what? I don't see any point in the previous refuseniks or the make it work resignees changing their minds. I simply don't see how, say Hilary Benn, could come back into any post and work with Jeremy Corbyn. So Labour will be left with a wholly ineffective Leader made still more ineffective by the absence of the rest of the Parliamnetary Party around him. If that is not an open invitation to Theresa May to call an early election and slaughter us I don't know what is.
But first it is well worth watching "The Outsider" documentary by Vice TV. This is a film made by avowed Corbyn supporters invited in by Seamus Milne, but it ends up coming across as something of a hatchet job by simple reporting. I am particularly thinking of Jeremy's refusal to attack the government following Iain Duncan Smith's resignation, which was frankly a bizarre way for the Leader of the Opposition to behave.
The ex-Shadow Cabinet portray an Opposition Leader who appears not to even want to oppose the Tories. Lilian Greenwood felt she was constantly undermined. Thanggam Debbonaire has a still more damning picture of ineptitude. Heidi Alexander thinks he doesn't have capacity to lead. These members have gone public, but I suspect all his former spokespeople would have similar stories of indecision, poor consultation, missing basic deadlines and so on.
This is before one gets on to Jeremy Corbyn's refusal to make any effort to unite the party on difficult policies like Trident (it is worth recalling that a continuous at sea deterrent remains Labour's official policy); his lack of an economic policy, his apparent knee jerk anti-western prejudices on Syria and the Ukraine; his shameful acceptance of payment from Press TV; his past record on the IRA, his equivocation on anti-semitism, and so on.
None of this seems to matter to many of the people signing up to the Labour Party to vote in our elections, but it does to the electors at large. As I write, Labour's poll standing is 29% and heading downwards _ which would take it beneath Michael Foot's horrific defeat in 1983. If that happens there may not be much of a Labour Party left to lead.
Nonetheless, Jeremy remains the favourite to win the party leadership, but then what? I don't see any point in the previous refuseniks or the make it work resignees changing their minds. I simply don't see how, say Hilary Benn, could come back into any post and work with Jeremy Corbyn. So Labour will be left with a wholly ineffective Leader made still more ineffective by the absence of the rest of the Parliamnetary Party around him. If that is not an open invitation to Theresa May to call an early election and slaughter us I don't know what is.
Tuesday, 19 July 2016
Samba in the Library at Willesden
Willesden Library had a Brazilian festival at the weekend. I can't help but admire the sheer range and variety of the events Brent Library staff manage to put on.
Monday, 18 July 2016
Kilburn Regeneration Ploughs On
Brent Council has another report on the transformation of South Kilburn. In many ways there are good sides to this, but it concerns me that there appears to be no public debate about it. Talking to people in the area, there seems to be just an acceptance that local people are powerless and whatever will happen will happen. That is not how local democracy should work.
Sunday, 17 July 2016
Parking Charges in Brent
Brent Council's next executive meeting contains yet another report on parking. This report is now to be an annual event.
Parking Charge Notices (PCNs) issued through CCTV have fallen dramatically, thanks to the government's rather illogical changes in this area. The report says that this is having a detrimental effect on traffic management around schools in particular.
Yet the total number of PCNs and the level of fines have gone up. This is because more cameras have been introduced at yellow box junctions, catching moving traffic offences. The Council says it is also better at collecting the fines, although the figures still seem to indicate that a lot of people are not paying. A 71% recovery rate implies almost a third of people don't pay. It is also noteworthy that the majority of on street parking is now paid cashlessly.
Parking Charge Notices (PCNs) issued through CCTV have fallen dramatically, thanks to the government's rather illogical changes in this area. The report says that this is having a detrimental effect on traffic management around schools in particular.
Yet the total number of PCNs and the level of fines have gone up. This is because more cameras have been introduced at yellow box junctions, catching moving traffic offences. The Council says it is also better at collecting the fines, although the figures still seem to indicate that a lot of people are not paying. A 71% recovery rate implies almost a third of people don't pay. It is also noteworthy that the majority of on street parking is now paid cashlessly.
Saturday, 16 July 2016
Cllr John Duffy Calling
I am glad to see Cllr John Duffy has resumed his blog. I don't agree with all his comments on Willesden High Road, but at least he is engaging with what Brent Council does, and trying to improve it.
Monday, 11 July 2016
A new Car Park for Deerhurst Road
Brent's Planning Committee has approved the new underground car park in Deerhurst Road with an agreement to count the number of car users. In past cases such agreements have been considered more or less unenforcable because they are so resource intensive. I doubt very much whether this case will be any different.